Sixteen Points to Consider Regarding the Ṛtvik
Issue
Sixteen Points to Consider Regarding the Ṛtvik Issue
By Pratyatoṣa Dāsa (ACBSP)
August 30, 1998 (Appearance Day of Srimati Rādhārāṇī)
Dear Prabhus, please accept my humble obeisances. All glories
to Śrīla Prabhupāda!
Concerning the “ṛtvik issue” (initiation on
Śrīla Prabhupāda’s behalf by a ṛtvik representative
of the Ācārya), please consider the following sixteen points:
1. Follow the Latest Order
From a lecture by Śrīla Prabhupāda on the
Srimad-Bhagavatam,
Hyderabad, India, April 15, 1975:
I may say many things to you,
but when I say something directly, "Do it", your first duty
is to do that. You cannot argue, "Sir, you said me like this
before." No, that is not your duty. What I say now, you do it.
That is obedience.
|
If the captain of the ship says “5° starboard” and the first
mate replies, “But captain, before you told me ‘10° port’.,”
then it can be understood that the first mate has gone insane.
2. The July 9th Letter (http://pratyatosa.com/July_9th_Letter.htm)
Letter by Tamāla Kṛṣṇa Gosvāmī
to all GBC’s and temple presidents, Vṛndāvana, India, July
9, 1977:
To All G.B.C. and Temple Presidents
Dear Maharajas and Prabhus,
Please accept my humble obeisances at your feet. Recently when all
of the GBC members were with His Divine Grace in Vrndavana, Srila
Prabhupada indicated that soon He would appoint some of His senior
disciples to act as ritvik - representative of the acarya, for the
purpose of performing initiations, both first initiation and second
initiation. His Divine Grace has so far given a list of eleven disciples
who will act in that capacity:
His Holiness Kirtanananda Swami
His Holiness Satsvarupa dasa Gosvami
His Holiness Jayapataka Swami
His Holiness Tamala Krsna Gosvami
His Holiness Hrdayananda Gosvami
His Holiness Bhavananda Gosvami
His Holiness Hamsaduta Swami
His Holiness Ramesvara Swami
His Holiness Harikesa Swami
His Grace Bhagavan dasa Adhikari
His Grace Jayatirtha dasa Adhikari
In the past Temple Presidents have written to Srila Prabhupada recommending
a particular devotee's initiation. Now that Srila Prabhupāda
has named these representatives, temple presidents may henceforward
send recommendation for first and second initiation to whichever of
these eleven representatives are nearest their temple. After considering
the recommendation, these representatives may accept the devotee as
an initiated disciple of Srila Prabhupada by giving a spiritual name,
or in the case of second initiation, by chanting on the Gayatri thread,
just as Srila Prabhupada has done. The newly initiated devotees are
disciples of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda,
the above eleven senior devotees acting as his representative. After
the temple president receives a letter from these representatives
giving the spiritual name or the thread, he can perform the fire yajna
in the temple as was being done before. The name of a newly initiated
disciple should be sent by the representative who has accepted him
or her to Srila Prabhupada, to be included in His Divine Grace's "Initiated
Disciples" book.
Approved: A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami [signed]
|
Please note that the above is the last formal instruction that Śrīla
Prabhupāda gave on initiations within his beloved ISKCON before his physical
departure on November 14, 1977. If someone quotes Śrīla Prabhupāda
as having said, “My disciples should become gurus.,” then this
obviously does not mean diksha (initiating) gurus within ISKCON, because his
last instruction (See point
#1
above) for ISKCON was to have ṛtviks (priests) initiate on his behalf
“henceforward.” If you search the Vedabase for “henceforward,”
you will see that Śrīla Prabhupāda always meant “from
this time forth; from now on,” which, according to the dictionary, is
the only literal meaning that the word “henceforward” can have.
3. Tamāla Kṛṣṇa Testifies
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa Gosvāmī, one
of the 11 original, ṛtvik - representatives of the ācārya
(See point
#2
above) said on December 3, 1980 (Transcribed from a tape recording of the
actual conversation):
Actually Prabhupada never appointed
any gurus. He appointed eleven ritviks. He never appointed them gurus.
Myself and the other GBC have done the greatest disservice to this
movement the last three years because we [falsely] interpreted the
appointment of ritviks as the appointment of gurus.
|
4. Haṁsadūta Testifies
Śrīla Prabhupāda wrote in signed letters to Haṁsadūta
Dāsa, one of the 11 original, ṛtvik - representatives of the ācārya
(See point #2 above):
July 10, 1977:
You are a suitable person and
you can give initiation to those that are ready for it. I have selected
you among eleven men as "Ritvik" representative of the Acharya,
to give initiations, both first and second initiation, on my behalf.
|
July 31, 1977:
Make your own field and continue
to be ritvik and act on my behalf.
|
Letter from Haṁsadūta to Veda Guhya Dās:
…It was clear that Srila
Prabhupada had officially introduced the concept of "Ritvik representative
of the Acharya" as the arrangement for initiations by his disciples
for the future of ISKCON. Had there been anything more to clarify
certainly Srila Prabhupada would have written another letter to amend
what was already so clear. But he never did, other than reinforce
what he had already written: "Continue to act as ritvik representative
of the Acharya."…
|
5. Śrīla Prabhupāda’s Will (http://pratyatosa.com/Prabhupadas_Will.htm)
From Śrīla Prabhupāda’s “DECLARATION
OF WILL,” June 5, 1977:
…The Governing Body Commission
(GBC) will be the ultimate managing authority of the entire International
Society for Krishna Consciousness…
…The system of management will continue as it is now and there
is no need of any change…
…Each new executive director for the ISKCON properties must
be my initiated disciple…
|
A person’s “will” is a legal document which goes into effect
after the person “dies.” What is to prevent a lawsuit from being
filed the second an attempt is made to make someone such as a “grand
disciple” a “new executive director for the ISKCON properties”
because he is not Śrīla Prabhupāda’s “initiated
disciple?” Śrīla Prabhupāda said that his books would
be the “law books for the next 10,000 years.” How is this possible
unless Śrīla Prabhupāda intended for initiations “on
my behalf” to continue for the next 10,000 years? If the Christian’s
policy of “accepting Lord Jesus in my heart” is not valid, and
they cannot make any spiritual advancement without the aid of a “living
guru,” as the GBC contends, then how did the follower of Lord Jesus,
St. Francis of Assisi, become such an incredibly great saint?
6. Christian Example
The following morning walk conversation, recorded in Seattle
on 10 February 1968, shows that Śrīla Prabhupāda approved of
the highly successful Christian system of encouraging their followers to accept
Lord Jesus Christ as their spiritual authority through the agency of a ṛtvik
representative (priest or minister):
Madhudviṣa: Is there any
way for a Christian to, without the help of a spiritual master, to
reach the spiritual sky through believing in the words of Jesus Christ
and trying to follow his teachings?
Prabhupāda: I don’t follow.
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Can a Christian in this age,
without a spiritual master, but by reading the Bible and following
Jesus’s words, reach the…
Prabhupāda: When you read Bible, you follow spiritual master.
How can you say without? As soon as you read Bible, that means you
are following the instruction of Lord Jesus Christ, that means you
are following spiritual master. So where is the opportunity of being
without spiritual master?
Madhudviṣa: I was referring to a living spiritual master.
Prabhupāda: Spiritual master is not the question of… Spiritual
master is eternal. Spiritual master is eternal. So your question is
without spiritual master. Without spiritual master you cannot be,
at any stage of your life. You may accept this spiritual master or
that spiritual master. That is a different thing. But you have to
accept. As you say that “by reading Bible,” when you read
Bible that means you are following the spiritual master represented
by some priest or some clergyman in the line of Lord Jesus Christ.
|
7. Ramakrishna Mission Example
Śrīla Prabhupāda’s letter to Kīrtanānanda,
February 11, 1967:
I wish that each and every Branch
shall keep their independent identity and cooperate keeping the Acarya
in the centre. On this principle we can open any number of Branches
all over the world. The Ramakrishna mission works on this principle
and thus as organization they have done wonderfully.
|
The Ramakrishna mission achieves “this principle” that Śrīla
Prabhupāda wants to be followed in ISKCON through a ṛtvik system.
8. Mistake in Our ISKCON Camp
Letter by Śrīla Prabhupāda to Rūpānuga
Dāsa, April 28, 1974:
[Srila Bhaktisiddhanta] never
recommended anyone to be acarya of the Gaudiya Math. … If Guru
Maharaja could have seen someone who was qualified at that time to
be acarya he would have mentioned. Because on the night before he
passed away he talked of so many things, but never mentioned an acarya.
… Therefore we may not commit the same mistake in our ISKCON
camp. … [The members of the Gauḍīya Maṭha]
cannot help us in our movement, but they are very competent to harm
our natural progress. So we must be very careful about them.
|
9. "Ṛtvik. Yes."
May, 1977: Śrīla Prabhupāda Begins Discussing
Ṛtvik Initiations:
From: Gauridas <Gauridas@*******.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 05:12:15 EDT
To: Pratyatosa Dasa
Subject: Re: Usenet Ritvik Discussion
In a message dated 98-05-14 02:29:27 EDT, Pratyatosa Dasa writes:
ROOM CONVERSATION. Vrindavana, May 28, 1977:
Satsvarupa Maharaja: "Then our next question concerns initiations
in the future, particularly at that time when you are no longer with
us. We want to know how first and second initiations will be conducted."
Srila Prabhupada: "Yes. I shall recommend some of you. After
this is settled up. I shall recommend some of you to act as officiating
acarya."
Tamala Krishna Maharaja: "Is that called ritvik-acarya?"
Srila Prabhupada: "Ritvik. Yes."
"Ritvik" is not a word which was part of the devotee lexicon
at that time. Therefore, it is obvious that Śrila Prabhupāda
had been talking about "ritviks" on previous occasions which
were never recorded, or the recordings were hidden or destroyed, otherwise
how would Tamal Krishna Goswami think to ask this question?
Here is a quote on this subject from "The Betrayal" by Puranjana
Prabhu:
"MYSTERIOUS GAPS? There are still mysterious and unaccounted
for 'time gaps' (missing tapes?) in these conversations. There is
no small amount of suspicion that some of the 'new gurus' are responsible
for this. Additionally, GBC’s such as Tamal Krishna Swami, Jayadvaita
Swami and others sometimes refer to the 'pre- May 28th ritvik guru
discussions.' However, no public record or indeed an existing scrap
or trace of these conversations is currently available. Where are
they?"
I would like to answer this question to the best of my ability.
When Srila Prabhupada said we should be officiating acharyas, Tamal
mentioned it because he heard Srila Prabhupada talk about it in the
garden days before. I stood before Srila Prabhupada, serving him with
the chamara [fan] during this time.
Tamal also admitted to me in a letter that the guru issue was "fraught
with errors". (TKG letter to GPD)
If the "Final Order" is too intellectual for some of your
readers, then I recommend that they read my historical account of
the facts in chronological order. I compiled it recently, and I call
it "On My Behalf".
Your servant,
Gauridasa Pandita Dasa
|
10. Unprecedented Technology
One thing that sets Śrīla Prabhupāda apart from
all of the other great saints of history is the fact that he left us not only
his books, but also, audio and video recordings of his exact words. All of
these recordings have been carefully transcribed into digital form. All of
Śrīla Prabhupāda’s books, lectures, conversations, letters,
etc. can be digitally copied in a few minutes with no possibility of changes
being made. This is certainly a great boon for this planet for the next 10,000
years, which, Śrīla Prabhupāda said, will be a “golden
age.”
11. Unprecedented Policies
If authorizing ṛtvik initiations on his behalf, after
his physical departure, are unprecedented in our line of Vaiṣṇavas
and cannot be supported by quotes from shastra (scriptures), so what? Śrīla
Prabhupāda also did many other things that are unprecedented in our Brahma-Gaudiya
Vaiṣṇava line of disciplic succession:
a. Crossing over the ocean as a sannyāsī.
b. Allowing his disciples to chant only 16 rounds a day instead
of 64.
c. Authorizing ṛtvik initiations on his behalf before
his physical departure.
d. Performing marriage ceremonies as a sannyāsī.
e. Giving Gāyatrī mantra initiation to women.
f. Traveling by air as a sannyāsī.
g. Allowing men and women to live together in the temple building.
h. Allowing women to lead kīrtanas.
i. Allowing women to give the Bhāgavatam class.
j. Allowing women to hold responsible positions of leadership
within the movement.
12. Witness Testimony
Date: 02/08/2000
Author: harinam <harinam@********.net
Hare Krishna Pratyatosh,
One more important piece of evidence that recently became public is
Srila Puri Maharaja's video taped interview in which he confirms that
Srila Prabhupada did explain to him his plan for ritvik representatives
initiating on his behalf after his physical disappearance.
The video is available for $19.95 at 1-800-310-video.
Thanks for taking the time to explain to all the anti-ritvik vadis
in the land of oz. I have done it on this board, VNN, and elsewhere
many times. Now there is a respectable witness (SP's godbrother) to
Srila Prabhupada's ritvik plan and we will see the deviants in ISKCON
looking more and more stupid. No one can say we did not warn them
as far back as 1978.
All glories to Srila Prabhupada.
|
13. It’s Offensive to Discipline a Real Guru
Posted on www.hindu-religion.net, September 17, 2003, by “Guest”:
The bottom line of the [ISKCON
guru] issue is whether or not any guru is subjected to the dictates
and discipline of the GBC. The fact that Prabhupada established the
GBC as the Governing Authority for ISKCON rules out the possibility
of any diksha gurus in ISKCON except him. Prabhupada ruled out the
diksha guru system in ISKCON by saying that a bona-fide spiritual
master is never subjected to the discipline or restrictions of a GBC
or anyone else. The fact that the GBC is in the position of having
to regulate and restrict the activities of the ISKCON gurus shows
that indeed there can be no gurus in ISKCON except Prabhupada. A real
guru is never subjected to the control and discipline of any committee,
Godbrother, disciple or anyone else. Śrī Guru is a free
agent independent of committee regulation or control. ISKCON clearly
has a whole set of rules and laws that regulate, discipline and restrict
all the diksha gurus in ISKCON. This situation is clearly in violation
of the teachings of Srila Prabhupada. We find his instructions in
the matter in the Nectar
of Instruction text 6 purport:
"It is also an offense to consider an empowered Vaishnava an
object of disciplinary action. It is offensive to try to give him
advice or to correct him…The spiritual master must not be subjected
to the advice of a disciple, nor should a spiritual master be obliged
to take instructions from those who are not his disciples. This is
the sum and substance of Srila Rupa Goswami's advice in this sixth
verse."
Srila Prabhupada is saying here that in the Rupanuga sampradaya a
spiritual master should not be subjected to the discipline or regulations
of any committee, individual or group of individuals. A real spiritual
master is not subject to such regulation.
Therefore, by establishing the GBC as the managing authority of ISKCON,
Srila Prabhupada ruled out the possibility of a multiplicity of gurus
in ISKCON by making the GBC the functioning authority over all ISKCON
affairs. In ISKCON today there is a class of spiritual masters who
are all subjected to the regulation and discipline of the GBC. This
is totally incongruent with the concept of a traditional spiritual
master who is above and beyond all such committee regulation.
Prabhupada said it is an offense to try and discipline or regulate
a spiritual master. Therefore either the regulating of ISKCON spiritual
masters by the GBC must stop or [the ISKCON] diksha guru system must
stop. Refusing to do so results in offenses which will destroy devotional
service and make [devotional service] fruitless and futile.
|
14. It’s Offensive to Say that Prabhupāda Left Things Unclear
“When Śrīla Prabhupāda was here, if the
temple president recommended you to be initiated, then you got initiated.
If he didn’t, then you didn’t. It was as simple as that. This
is the way it should be today.” (“Śrīla Prabhupāda
Left Things Unclear? No!!!” - http://www.pratyatosa.com/SrilaPrabhupadaLeftThings
UnclearNo.htm):
“…to say that Śrīla Prabhupāda was
negligent in regards to making it extremely clear how initiations were to
be continued in post-samadhi ISKCON is a very great offense against my Guru
Mahārāja, Śrīla Prabhupāda!” (“The GBC
Can’t Have It Both Ways” - http://www.pratyatosa.com/GbcCantHaveItBothWays.htm
)
15. I Shall Never Die
He reasons ill who tells that
Vaiṣṇavas die, when thou are living still in sound.
|
Science of Self Realization Introduction by Mukunda Dāsa Gosvāmī:
"I shall never die.",
Śrila Prabhupāda’s once said. "I shall live forever
in my books."
|
Anytime one of Śrīla Prabhupāda’s disciples would ask
him for permission to initiate, Prabhupāda would tell him that as a matter
of etiquette, he should wait until Prabhupāda was no longer present.
Because Śrīla Prabhupāda is never going to leave us, I take
this as a polite way of telling him “I don’t want anyone else
taking on disciples on his own behalf in my institution.”
16. Self Motivation and Bad Association
Are the above fifteen points not obvious? Even an intelligent
karmī can understand, in a few minutes, that Śrīla Prabhupāda
prescribed ṛtvik initiations for the future of ISKCON. It’s crystal
clear. It’s all there in signed, written documents (See #2
and #5
above). After reading the above fifteen points, if someone still tries to
make Śrīla Prabhupāda’s own terminology (ṛtvik)
into a dirty word, or tries to say that Śrīla Prabhupāda left
things unclear or subject to debate, or tries to vilify the proponents of
Śrīla Prabhupāda’s own idea, the ṛtvik system of
initiations, then he can be understood to:
a. …have the “I wanna be a guru” disease,
or he is influenced by those who have the disease. In other words, he is self-motivated.
b. …have disobeyed Śrīla Prabhupāda by
hearing from members of the Gauḍīya Maṭha (http://pratyatosa.com/GaudiyaMath.htm),
or by associating with those who have heard from the Gauḍīya Maṭha.
Prabhupāda said in a signed, written document:
We shall be very careful about
them and not mix with them. THIS IS MY INSTRUCTION TO YOU ALL. They
cannot help us in our movement, but they are very competent to harm
our natural progress. So we must be very careful about them.
|
What could be more clear than this? Prabhupāda made it very clear that
we should not hear from them in an way, shape, or form, for fear that we might
become contaminated/bewildered. Brahmānanda Prabhu, former GBC man and
ISKCON’s first temple president, confirmed to me very recently that
it’s very important not to hear from them.
Conclusion
From an initiation lecture by Śrīla Prabhupāda
in Boston, December 26, 1969:
[Kṛṣṇa consciousness]
is simple for the simple, but it is very hard for the crooked.
|
I firmly believe that the simple, straightforward logic which I have presented
above will very easily stand up in any court of law in the world, what to
speak of the court of public opinion.
If a disciple of Śrīla Prabhupāda is actually
qualified to be an independent dīkṣā (initiating) guru, and
he has that desire, then he can start his own institution, like Śrīla
Prabhupāda did, so what’s the problem?
Your servant, Pratyatoṣa Dāsa (ACBSP)
(pratyatosa.com,
pratyatosa@gmail.com)