About Polygamy From: Parijata2@aol.com [Text 2176591 from COM]

<Actually, I a couple of weeks ago, I wrote a reply to Ameyatma's recent
attack on you/defense of "polygamy.">

I just wanted to comment that I know Ameyatma personally and what he says
does not match what he does. He speaks about polygamy as protection, but in
reality he has run after a young, shapely gurukuli who he should be viewing
as daughter. He may claim it is Vedic, but ask any mother. I know amongst
ourselves when mothers talk about older men wanting to marry their
daughters or just a young girl, they say, "Vedic schmedic. They are lusty!"
I agree and find it perverted that a man of fathers age runs after young
girl.

These girls have grown up with some of these men around them and viewed
them as father, then he wants her as wife? Not all of them grew up around
these specific men however, these young girls generally view older men as
father, not as potential husband. So it must be a shock to them and I don't
think these gurukuli's need any more shocks. I pray Ameyatma realized he is
in one of the biggest types of maya he can be in and snaps out of it, but
it won't happen without preaching against his nonsense.

Before this he almost married his wife's sister. He is definitely running
after women, and young women at that. Even the sister, she is much younger
than the wife. Let him talk of protection. I will laugh. He is not going
after the homely, helpless woman of his age to protect and help her, but
the competent young female of daughters age with shapely body. And that
isn't lust? I see through it.

Personally, I find that all those who believe in polygamy are doing it for
lusty reasons and are not qualified in the least, as they like to try to
convince us they are. Nor is it needed in this age.

YS, Prtha dd