Mahaman calls manhandled matajis unscrupulous women
Comment by Aruna das, Austria
Date: 19. Nov. 1999

What has a old rotten cheese, Vipramukhya and Mahaman in common?
Actually they all stink to the sky.

That was my realization when I read Vipramukhyas article about what was really going on in Vrindaban. Vipermukhya quotes in his article Mahaman, both denouncing the Ladies who have been manhandled

The women have actually been manhandled and pushed around by the men, but the men say that the women pushed and shoved around the sannyasis (perhaps they were bogus sannyasis). They are completely twisting it around just to discredit the integrity of the women.

Just see the smoke screen tactics of those who are devious. They will never give up and always attack and blame others.

to summarize it, they conclude as follows:
--------------------------------------------------
1. matajis, both resident and visiting have shown belligerent and unwarranted behaviour
2. these matajis causing a disturbance to the peaceful situation in Vrindavana
3. these matajis blatantly defied the temple authorities
4. these matajis tried to impose upon the temple traditions unacceptical standards
5. these matajis are unruly elements who are outraging the senior men of the community."
6. these matajis must rectify their misconduct
7. these matajis encroached upon the Radha Shyamsundar altar
8. these matajis stopped sannyasis from paying obeisance’s to the deities
9. these matajis obstinacy was causing inconvenience to sannyasis and other men devotees
10. these matajis blatantly defied amicable Temple arrangement for darshan of deities

Mahaman says these matajis are unscrupulous women, they behaved indecently towards the men by pushing and shoving them. Therefore these matajis forcing the management to take strict disciplinary action which precipitated the present situation in the Vrindavan temple of manhandling the women.

If these matajis do not apologize they should be threatened with severe disciplinary action

-------------------------------

WOW! The ten offences of the matajis. What is the meaning of encroaching upon the Radha Shyamsundar altar. These „bad" matajis encroaching on Krishna, what an offence! They really should be punished for this.

Since they tried to impose upon the temple traditions and standards which are not approved of by Srila Prabhupada, as per his several instructions on this matter, these matajis are against Srila Prabhupada. WOW again. Perhaps they should be excommunicated for this.

Mahamana threatens that unless they apologize and rectify their misconduct, "severe disciplinary action will be taken against the unruly elements who are outraging the senior men and women of the community."

-----------------------------------

Notice how man like this do not focus on the abuse that happened to the women of Vrndavana?! These men who are the abuser always blame the abused. They always find ways to twist it in order to discredit the position of women.

A society that doesn't honor women and protect them, along with protection of children, old people, brahmins (intelligencia) and cows ultimately becomes a society not worth living in.

Some of the GBC sympathizers saying that these women there were acting inappropriately and aggressively, and in sum these women are to blame for being punched and kicked out of the way. Indeed, one GBC clone says that these women are "femi-nazis." This fundamentalist "He-Man Woman Haters Club" mentality must stop. This is not a man vs woman issue, it is a right vs wrong issue, a truth vs falsehood issue.

The recent problem in Vrindavana is therefore rooted in this anti-women mood. It seems that some of the ladies are picking up on this vile anti-woman mood and so they stood up for themselves. They realize that at the heart of their problems are these saffron elite, and instinctively they know these guys are coming in to make some show bottle obeisance’s, while many of these saffron elite have been sitting all day in their offices cooking up plots to exploit these ladies, force children to worship molesters, bogus gurus, protect cow slaughtering lackeys, and so on.

Some of these big sannyasis are wearing expensive silks, if not ruby and diamond jewelry, and they are getting expensive oil for their massages and in sum, they seem to be enjoying things that are normally provided without question to: women? In fact, wearing expensive silk clothing and jewelry is normally for women and this is common knowledge? A sannyasa is supposed to be renounced and wear simple cotton clothes, beg his food and eat sparsely.

Isk con Sannyasis enjoy like householder and if they are caught with illicit sex, they just get married. The so called women protection is only for exploitation, because women are good enough to only collect money for the elite.

Iskcon sanyasis and gurus are actually very attached to sex life (which anyone can understand by hearing their lectures) and being denied the benefit of the householder asrama, they could only barely survive gross sexual misconduct by directing overt hatred to women and the children produced of sex life. Look how many of them returned to gross sex life and see how many children got molested. What a travesty!

How can women- and children-hating sannyasis, gurus, and other sexually frustrated persons, making a pretense of celibacy, manage our Movement consisting of so many women and children?

Also of interest, some of these big sannyasas seem to have money for their millionaire lifestyle for themselves, but they provide no funds for their own ex-wife and children, who they left to fend for themselves out on the street?

Here it is the sannyasis that have the money and live a life of luxury and ease instead of one of renunciation. Does this please Srila Prabhupada? That is the corruption of the sannyasa asrama. Because Iskcon leaders deviated, all these problems have resulted.

How is it possible for sannyasis, who have no connection with money to come up with own money and bank accounts? My guess is that they are not real sannyasis, but merely wealthy bachelors in a peculiar dress. Iskcon celibate priests will be laughed at as pretenders and so called sannyasis are simply cheats.

One of the underlying reasons that we keep finding that cows, children, women and senior devotees are mistreated is, that Iskcon leaders created bogus gurus, artificial sannyasis and child molesters, to be worshipped as representatives of god.

This is the problem, when "abusive to women and children" bogus individuals are being worshipped as good as god, their ugly influences spread all around, like a cancerous infection.

Your servant Aruna das, Austria

To all of you Iskcon machos, purushas, gays, GHQ, homos, woman and child haters:

Concerning your mistranslation - misinterpretation:

Bhagavad Gita, 9:32 says:

maam hi paartha vyapaasritya
ye 'pi syuh paapayonayah
striyo vaisyas tathaa suudraas
te 'pi yaanti paraam gatim

Translation:

For those who take refuge in Me, O Paartha (Arjuna),
though they are lowly born, women, Vaisyas, as well
as Suudras, they also attain to the highest goal.

Thus, the Supreme Lord promises that the highest goal is available to all people without distinction of sex, race, caste, etc. The societal distinction of low-born, high-born, women, men, varnas (including Sudras, Vaishyas, etc.) are irrelevant from the Supreme Lord's point of view, and he promises salvation to all people who look to him and take refuge in him.

Misguided people mistranslate this verse deliberately and sometimes through ignorance.
They apply "paapayonayah" as an adjective to "striyah" and infer that women are lowly born, but that clearly is not the intention in the verse, as "paapayonayah" is a noun that applies to all people who have had lowly tendencies, men or women. He promises that even they are raised to the highest level. Women, unfortunately, undergo discrimination in most societies throughout history, and so do Sudras and Vaishyas, many times, and even Kshatriyas and Brahmanas. The infinite compassion from the Supreme Lord is very clear from this verse, as well as in the rest of the Gita, and there should be no doubt as to its meaning, importance and relevance, to contemporary society.

From Pada Jan. 07, 2001, women abuse:

by Nara Narayana Visvakarma

NNV: My immediate "Authorities" and mentors were Tamal Krishna, and Gargamuni ...both complete and "unreconstructed" misogenists. Bhavananda, who hated women and children, was my assistant, and then associate.

NNV: I worked under the direction of Jayatirtha and Rameshwara and Karandhar, all of whom held women in Contempt.

NNV: I had never lived in a "nest" of active homosexuals before. It seemed that they had a "cult" of hatred for women, sneering and mocking them as though they had no value whatsoever.

General Board of Complaints gbc1008@aol.com Prabhupadanuga's Austria

Chant Hare Krishna and be happy!
All glories to His Divine Grace A.C.Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada!