Rebuttal
to Rupanuga's Article on "I Stop for the Time Being"
The
logic given by the GBC and now Rupanuga does not hold up. His recent
(March 11) article deals with a conversation between Srila Prabhupad and several
GBC on Oct 18th, 1977, concerning the initiation of one Bengali Gentleman.
Rupanuga,
inline with the current GBC, take this conversation as evidence that Srila
Prabhupad had stopped acting as initiator guru, having as of that date, given
his order for the 11 Rtviks to then act as regular initiator gurus.
I herein refute their logic.
The
Oct 18th conversation takes place, as Rupanuga states because, "A
Bengali gentleman has come from New York seeking initiation from Srila Prabhupada.
But Srila Prabhupada has already deputed his ritvik acaryas and he thinks
Jayapataka should do the initiation." Yes,
this is true. Even Rupanuga admits that Srila Prabhupad had deputed Jayapataka
to act as Rtvik, and here on Oct 18th is asking him to perform the initiation.
Rupanuga does not make the argument that on Oct 18th Srila Prabhupad actually
asked Jayapatak to become the initiator guru, but several current GBC have
made that argument. I will address both ideas.
Rupanuga
then quotes from the conversation starting at what he claims is the most relevant
part. However, when we look at the beginning of that conversation we
see that he actually misses very relevant aspects. Here is where the
conversation actually begins on this topic:
Prabhupada:
Hare Krsna. One Bengali gentleman has come from New York?
Tamala
Krsna:
Yes. Mr. Sukamal Roy Chowdury.
Prabhupada:
So I have deputed some of you to initiate. Hm?
Tamala
Krsna:
Yes. Actually... Yes, Srila Prabhupada.
Prabhupada:
So I think Jayapataka can do that if he likes. I have already deputed. Tell
him.
Tamala
Krsna:
Yes.
Prabhupada:
So, deputies, Jayapataka's name was there?
[Below
is where Rupanuga started his quote - and his quote actually differes
from what is in the Vedabase]
Bhagavan:
It is already on there, Srila Prabhupada. His name was on that list.
Prabhupada:
So I depute him to do this at Mayapura, and you may go with him. I stop for
the time being. Is that all right?
Tamala
Krsna:
Stopped doing what, Srila Prabhupada?
Prabhupada:
This initiation. I have deputed the, my disciples. Is it clear or not?
Giriraja:
It's clear.
Prabhupada:
You have got the list of the names?
Tamala
Krsna:
Yes, Srila Prabhupada.
Prabhupada:
And if by Krsna's grace I recover from this condition, then I shall begin
again, or I may not be pressed in this condition to initiate. It is not good.
Giriraja:
We will explain to him so that he will understand properly.
Prabhupada:
Hm? Hm?
Giriraja:
I said we will explain to the Bengali gentleman just as you have described
to us, so that he'll be satisfied with this arrangement.
>>>
Ref. VedaBase => Room Conversation -- October 18, 1977, Vrndavana
Rupanuga
claims that,
'The key sentences here are not the ones containing the word “depute,”
but rather the following: “I stop for the time being,” “And
if by Krsna’s grace I recover from this condition, then I shall begin
again.” '
However,
I strongly protest that before we can understand the "I stop for the time
being" sentence we must first understand the context of the conversation to
know, in reality, what it is that Srila Prabhupad is referring to that he
is stopping. And to do that, we must first properly understand the "depute"
aspect in full context.
Go
back to the very start of the conversation.
Prabhupada: So I have deputed some of you to initiate. Hm?
Srila
Prabhupad declares that he has (I have)
deputed.
Srila Prabhupad is speaking in Past Tense. He is speaking about something
he has already done in the past. Not now, not on Oct 18th, but he is referring
to that which has already deputedat
some time in the past. (I point out the tense because there have been
GBC members who have put forth the arugment that Srila Prabhupad was deputing
Jayaptaka on Oct 18 to become regular guru. But, Srila Prabhupad is herein
referring to having already deputed him in the past tense, not what he was
newly deputing him to do that day).
Importantly
is that Srila Prabhupad refers to what he had deputed Jayapataka to do was
"to Initiate". In Srila Prabhupad's own words he says that he had already
deputed those men to "initiate". And, we shall see as we continue with
the conversation that he is referring back to the July 9th list of Rtvik-Representatives
who had been only deputed to perform the rtvik aspects of the initiations.
Thus, what Srila Prabhupad is referring to here by the single word "initiate"
is in actuality a referrence to the rtvik aspects of the initiation process,
only, and not to the full process of initiation.
Tamala Krsna: Yes. Actually... Yes, Srila Prabhupada.
Prabhupada: So I think Jayapataka can do that if he likes. I have already deputed. Tell him.
Again,
Srila Prabhupad clearly uses the Past Tense, "I have
already
deputed"
He has ALREADY DeputED those men to "initiate", but only the Rtvik aspect
of the initiation.
Tamala Krsna: Yes.
Prabhupada: So, deputies, Jayapataka's name was there?
Again,
Past Tense: "Jayapataka's name was
there" Was Where???
Bhagavan: It is already on there, Srila Prabhupada. His name was on that list.
It is obvious that those devotees present knew exactly what Srila Prabhupad was referring to. When Srila Prabhupad asks if Jayapataka's name was there, Bhagavan agrees that "it is already on there", "His name was on that list".
Bhagavan
also is speaking in Past Tense. His name was already on that
list.
That
List.
What is that
list?
Everyone, the GBC, everyone agrees that
list
refers to the Rtvik-Representative list of 11 names given in the July 9th
letter. That is the only list where Srila Prabhupad had given a list
of men whom he had already deputed to 'initiate', and that July 9th letter
explicitly and clearly defines the specific type and limitation of the sort
of initiations. What Srila Prabhupad here refers to by the word "initiate"
clearly refers to just the rtviks aspects of the initiation process.
Prabhupada: So I depute him to do this at Mayapura, and you may go with him. I stop for the time being. Is that all right?
Now,
here Srila Prabhupad is using Present Tense. On Oct. 18th, 1977, Prabhupad
is now deputing Jayapataka to do something. Previously Srila Prabhupad had
deputed him and the other 11 men to act as Rtvik representatives, but, today
Srila Prabhupad is now giving something new for Jayapataka. What is
that? Prabhupad is deputing 'him' (Jayapataka) to do 'this'
at Mayapura. "This"? What is 'this'? In the context
of the conversation, to do that which Srila Prabhupad had Already
Deputed
Him to Do, in That
List
(July 9th letter), and that was to perform the Rtvik aspects of the initiation
only. The only thing new that Srila Prabhupad was deputing JP
to do on Oct 18th is that Prabhupad is now deputing him to perform the rtvik
initiations for Mayapura. In the July 9th letter Srila Prabhupad had stated
that whoever is 'nearest', and since this was in Bengal and Jayapataka resided
there, Srila Prabhupad is saying that Jayaptaka should then perform the rtvik
initiation there. That is the only new thing that Srila Prabhupad deputed,
in Present Tense, on Oct 18th.
Now
we come to the part that obviously the GBC is mis-understanding and thus mis-presenting.
Prabhupada: So I depute him to do this at Mayapura, and you may go with him. I stop for the time being. Is that all right?
Tamala Krsna: Stopped doing what, Srila Prabhupada?
Prabhupada: This initiation. I have deputed the, my disciples. Is it clear or not?
Giriraja: It's clear.
Note
carefully Srila Prabhupad's words and use of tense. Srila Prabhupad
is now Stopping. Stopping what? Stopping that which he has
Already
Deputed
his disciples to do in that list. And what is that, This
Initiation.
The
word this
is very important. In previous email discussions I have had with GBC
or their supporters over this issue they take it that Srila Prabhupad is herein
declaring that he is no longer going to act as the initiator guru. That he
is declaring here that he is now stopping, or no longer performing initiations
as the initiator guru. They argue that this statement means that from now
onward those whom he had earlier appointed as rtviks would now become the
initator guru as Srila Prabhupad was now stopping.
However,
this logic does not make sense in the context of the conversation. Rather,
up to this point, the entire conversation was regarding the Rtvik aspects
of Initiation that Prabhupad had already, in that list, deputed these men
to perform. Within this conversation the aspect of who will be the regular
guru has not been discussed. It was not part of this conversation. Rather,
Srila Prabhupad was only referring to the Rtvik Aspects of the Initiation
process. Srila Prabhupad was only referring to That
which
he had
Already DeputED his
men on That
List
to do.
Thus,
when Srila Prabhupad says that he is stopping "this" initiation we must understand
that the word "this" is referring to the aspects of initiation that were being
discussed in the same conversation. In context of the conversation itself.
Note
from the very beginning of the conversation that Srila Prabhupad simply used
the word "Initiate"
to indicate that which he had already deputed his men to do in the July 9th
list, which was the Rtvik aspects of the initiation process only. Here
Srila Prabhupad says he is now stopping. He is asked what is it that he is
stopping, and Srila Prabhupad says "Thisinitiation".
This, the rtvik aspects that was being discussed. What clinches this
understanding is that in the same sentence he connects "This
initiation"
to "I
have deputed
the, my disciples." Clearly, Srila Prabhupad, in his own
words, is making the connection crystal clear. Since the entire conversation
was only about the Rtvik aspects of initiation that he had already deputed
his men to do, the word 'this' can only refer to the same topic that was being
discussed, and Prabhupad makes this abundantly clear by saying, as "I have
deputed". As he has already deputed those men to do (which is wha the
entire conversation was about), and that was the rtvik aspects of the initiation
only.
"This
initiation" cannot be referring to the aspect of him accepting the disciple
as guru, as this was not the topic being discussed in the conversation and
neither was that what he had already deputed those men to do. Here "this initiation"
and as "I have [already] deputed" is inseparably linked.
Thus,
for the GBC to construe that here Srila Prabhupad means that he is stopping
the process of being the initiator guru is baseless. It is introducing
a meaning for the word initiate that is out side of the context of this conversation.
There
is another argument that many GBC have given in regards to this conversation.
That
other argument is that via the July 9th list they argue that Srila Prabhupad
had already stopped the Rtvik aspects of initiation. Thus, the argument is
if Srila Prabhupad had already stopped performing the rtvik aspects of initiation,
then he would not be saying on Oct 18th that he is now stopping the rtvik
aspects. Thus, following this logic they argue that Srila Prabhupad
could only be referring to the aspect of being the actual guru. That
he was stopping all aspects of initiation.
While
this may seem, on first glance, to be solid logic, on careful examination
it also doesn't hold water.
"This
initiation. I
have deputed
the, my disciples". To understand what 'this' refers to, we need to examine
what exactly he had deputed those men to do in that July 9th list to see if
Srila Prabhupad had indeed previously stopped performing that which he had
previously deputed them to do, OR, is there actually clear evidence that he
did not stop 'this' aspect of the rtvik initiaton process that he is herein
refering to until Oct 18th!
The
following is directly from the July 9th letter [after the list of 11 men is
given, which are therein referred to as Rtvik Representatives]:
"In
the past Temple Presidents have written to Srila Prabhupada recommending a
particular devotee's initiation. Now that Srila Prabhupada has named these
representatives, Temple Presidents may henceforward send recommendation for
first and second initiation to whichever of these eleven representatives are
nearest their temple. After considering the recommendation, these representatives
may accept the devotee as an initiated disciple of Srila Prabhupada by giving
a spiritual name, or in the case of second initiation, by chanting on the
Gayatri thread, just as Srila Prabhupada has done. The newly initiated devotees
are disciples of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupad, the
above eleven senior devotees acting as His representative. After the Temple
President receives a letter from these representatives giving the spiritual
name or the thread, he can perform the fire yajna in the temple as was being
done before. The name of a newly initiated disciple should be sent by the
representative who has accepted him or her to Srila Prabhupada, to be included
in His Divine Grace's "Initiated Disciples" book."
On
Oct 18th clearly Srila Prabhupad is referring to the process of rtvik initiations
that he had already deputed those 11 men to perform, as stated in that list,
Juy 9th letter. So, here, above, is the specific details
as to what aspects of the initiation process Srila Prabhupad had deputed those
men to perform. It is "This" aspect of initiation that Srila Prabhupad is
now stopping.
No
where in the Oct 18th conversation, or in the July 9th list referred to in
that conversation is Srila Prabhupad ever speaking of ceasing to be the initiator
guru. What he had deputed these men to do was that previously
temple presidents had given the list of recommended new devotees to Srila
Prabhupad, and that Srila Prabhupad, himself, and only he, made the final
decision to accept those men or not.
The
single unique feature of the July 9th letter is that Srila Prabhupad had now
selected 11 men to make that final decision on his behalf, and he has given
them the title as Rtvik-Representatives, or Rtvik-Acharyas. He
had now authorized them to make the final decisions for whom should be initiated
as a direct disciple of Srila Prabhupad, and select the names of the new devotees.
All
other aspects of the rtvik initiations were to remain unchanged and continue
on as they were already doing. Here is the exact wording: "After
the Temple President receives a letter from these representatives giving the
spiritual name or the thread, he can perform the fire yajna in the temple
as was being done before. The name of a newly initiated disciple should be
sent by the representative who has accepted him or her to Srila Prabhupada,
to be included in His Divine Grace's "Initiated Disciples" book."
The
Temple Present who sent the letter of recommendation, in the past to Srila
Prabhupad, and now to the Rtvik-Representative, on getting the confirmation
letter back, the Temple President will now perform the actual fire yajna in
the temple, as they had been already doing before (before the July 9th letter).
Thus,
the Single Unique feature of that July 9th list is that Srila Prabhupad had
authorized those 11 men to make the final decision on his behalf. That
from now on rather then TP's recommending the new initiates to Srila Prabhupad,
they would now make those recommendations to the nearest Rtvik Representative,
and the Rtvik will make that decision on Srila Prabhupad's behalf.
That
is it. That is the sum and substance of what the July 9th letter deputed those
men to do. No more, no less.
Clearly,
in that letter, Srila Prabhupad states that He remains the actual initiator
guru, that the new initiates will be his direct disciples.
On
Oct 18th he repeatedly refers back to what he had previously deputed these
men to do.
But,
what about the argument that Srila Prabhupad had already stopped doing this
as of July 9th? And, if so, then he could not be saying he is
again stopping the same thing on Oct 18th.
The
actual fact is, as is clearly shown in this Oct 18th conversation, is that
the GBC had NOT
yet implemented those aspects of the July 9th letter. How is that?
Because, here it is on Oct 18th and the GBC have come to Srila Prabhupad informing
him that this Bengali Gentleman wants to be Srila Prabhupad's disciple and
they are asking Prabhupad to still make the decisions as to whether Srila
Prabhupad will accept him, and even how and who will perform the intiations.
Clearly,
as of Oct 18th the GBC are still approaching Prabhupad and still requesting
him to make the final decision. Yet, this making of the final decision
is the entire sum and substance of the July 9th list. To make the final
decision is the sum and substance of what he had deputed those men to do on
July 9th. From then on temple presidents were to make the recommendations
to the nearest Rtvik, and those Rtviks were to make the final decision, on
Srila Prabhupad's behalf, and select the names. By actually doing
this, then Srila Prabhupad would no longer need be directly - physically -
consulted or involved.
But,
here it is, Oct 18th, and the GBC are still approaching Srila Prabhupad and
still asking him to perform the very same duties that he had deputed those
men to do on his behalf.
Thus,
when we examine the entire context, by seeing what it was that Srila Prabhupad
was referring to when he says I am now Stopping 'this' initiation, as I have
already deputed his men to do on his behalf, we clearly see that those men
had not, at all, taken up that duty, and that as of Oct 18th they are still
approaching Srila Prabhupad, still asking him to do that which he had deputed
them to do.
Thus,
when Srila Prabhupad says that he is Now Stopping, when we view it within
the context, we see that he is only refering to the aspect that he is now
no longer going to be involved in making the final decisions.
The sole topic of this conversation is about that which he had already deputed
his men to do (make that final decision on his behalf), and yet, Srila Prabhupad
clearly refered to this aspec by the single word 'initiate'.
This
logic all makes perfect sense. No contradictions and no twisting or
contortions. The logic is consistent throughout this conversation and
is consistent with what he had deputed his men to do, consisten with the content
of the referenced July 9th list.
On
the other hand, the GBC idea that when Srila Prabhupad said 'this' initiation,
that he meant the aspect of being actual guru, such logic is full of inconsistencies.
The only topic of the conversation and the referenced list is about the rtvik
aspects, specifically the duty of making the final decision. To say
that 'this' now refers to being the actual guru is a topic that was not being
discussed. It is totally outside the context of the conversation. Where
is there any evidence that Srila Prabhupad meant something totally out of
the context? In the same sentence he says, I have deputed
the, my disciples.. 'This' refers to that which he had already deputed
them to do.
And,
how can we accept the (ill) logic that Prabhupad is, on Oct 18th, deputing
those men to become actual initiator gurus? That topic, who will be
the actual initiator guru is not at all discussed in this conversation.
The GBC are implying it is by the words 'this initiation', but Prabhupad connects
'this' to that which he had already deputed his men to do in that list.
There is no other proof or evidence that Srila Prabhupad was on that day deputing
those men to now act as initator guru, it is all in the confused mental state
of the gbc. Out side of their mental concoction, such evidence does not exist.
Rather, Srila Prabhupad makes clear reference and connection to There in That
List where he had already deputed his men to do 'this' initiation, and in
that referrenced list the topic of who is the actual initiator guru is mentioned,
and that is clearly declared to be Srila Prabhupad.
It
is also totally absurd to say that Srila Prabhupad was herein asking Jayapataka
to become this man's initiator guru. The Bengali man had requested to
become Srila Prabhupad's initiated disciple. To accept that Prabhupad
now wanted Jps to become this man's initiator guru would mean that Prabhupad
was dictating that the poor fellow must now become Jayapataka's disciple instead.
Without even discussing this with the man, Prabhupad would simply dictate
who he must now accept as his eternal savior? He asks to be Prabhupad's
disciple, and without even speaking to the man, Prabhupad is dictating that
he must become disciple of someone else? Such an idea or concept
is totally opposed to what Prabhupad has taught in his books. Where
is the test between disciple and guru? Where is there relationship?
How can the GBC promote this madness that Srila Prabhupad would dictate such
a thing? He would then be dictating to the man who his guru will be,
and dictating to Jps who his disciple will be. This is madness.
Srila Prabhupad would never do such a thing, and never did such a thing.
But, that is what the GBC want us to believe. And, they are concocting
meanings outside of the context of the conversation as evidence of their mental
concocted ideas. Srila Prabhupad never did such a thing. He did not,
on Oct 18th, depute Jayapataka to become that man's guru, he did not dictate
to this man who his guru was to be. He did not Stop acting as the initiator
guru.
Thus,
we reject the logic given by the GBC, and by Rupanuga.
Srila
Prabhupad never authorized these men to become regular gurus. Especially
not in this Oct 18th conversation.