|
Quoted
from PADA Newsletter March 10, 1999
"I am in ISKCON
only from last couple of years. And I was a guru vadi till last year middle. So
I am not sure whom do you refer to many times in your news letter like probably
in the next news letter you should update us all by preparing a who's who. If
it is not possible to publicly put it out, then at least, send me a list to this
address."
Who is:
1. Condom-pada. I guess it is Harikesha dasa.
(PADA: correct)
But why is he
called "condom pada"? (PADA:
We gave him that title because that is what he really is: not "Srila Vishnupada.")
And what is
this "GBC certified condoms."
Are the two related? What's the story behind it?
(PADA: We made a joke: that since the GBC has thousands of rules for what is bona
fide and what is not, then their guru must have been using GBC committee certified
condoms, since they certify everything else? Its a joke, but not too far from
the truth since they knew he was fallen for quite awhile, but they continued to
authorize him as guru. Worse, his picture was still on the altar some time, even
after it was known he was bogus).
Did he receive
condoms from GBCs? Why? What was GBC's "official" excuse for doing so?
(PADA: No, he did not get condoms from the GBC, at least we hope not, but he was
fallen for a long time and the GBC covered it up, so in that sense, the GBC condones
gurus using condoms).
2. Who / What's
the story behind, "voted in as gurus at KNOWN pedophile
recoronations"?
(PADA: In 1986, at the GBC's Mayapura meeting, the GBC re-coronated a known homosexual
pedophile as a guru, namely Bhavananda, and they simultaneously voted in 20 more
gurus such as Trivrikrama, Bir Krishna, Gaura Govinda, etc., so this is called
"certified as guru at a known homosexual guru's
re-coronation").
3. Who are the,
"child sex padas" (PADA: homosexual
pedophiles such as Bhavananda and Kirtanananda, child touchers like Lokanatha,
and indeed anyone who has sex with a follower is like a father having sex with
his own daughter, this would include Jaggadisha et al., says Srila Prabhupada,
etc.),
anal sex padas, (PADA: homosexuals the GBC
made into their gurus).
condom
padas, (PADA: some GBC gurus use condoms in their illicit sex-capades).
Mafia
padas,
(PADA: Some GBC are alleged to be connected to Mafia or criminals).
muff
padas". (PADA: Gurus who engage in oral sex with female "disciples,"
like Jayatirtha).
And what's the
story behind it? My guesses are: "condom pada" is "Harikesha",
"Mafia pada is GKG. Who are the others?
***********************
End of text **********************
Unrolling
the Condom
Maria Ekstrand
(Madhusudani Radha Devi Dasi, a disciple
of Jayapataka Swami) is listed as the "Project Director" for the
"Healthy Oakland Teens Project". This project involves teaching the
following to coed classes of children as young as 12 years old!:
http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/prevention/prevention_models/2098.29a5
.html#actC
(article removed)
***********************
Begin copied text **********************
5.
Unrolling the Condom
Using a plastic
model, demonstrate the steps as they are presented. Lubricated condoms work best
for the demonstration.
"Now I'm going
to pinch the tip of the condom. This leaves enough space for the semen to go.
If your condom has a little tip built in, it is easier to leave a space. While
still pinching the tip, unroll the condom all the way down to the base of the
penis. Smooth out any air bubbles that might be trapped inside. This also keeps
the condom from breaking. Now is the time when you would add more lubricant, on
the outside of the condom if necessary. Don't put lubricant on the shaft of the
penis before putting a condom on, because it will slip right off."
6. Removing
the condom
Again, demonstrate
as you go.
"Soon after
the male has ejaculated, pull away gently while holding onto the base of the condom,
so that it doesn't slip off. It's important to do this BEFORE the penis has lost
its hardness, because the condom can accidentally slip off when the penis is soft.
Be careful not to spill the contents when taking the condom off. Throw the used
condom away. It may help to tie a knot in the condom. Never use the same condom
twice."
2. After you have
finished your demonstration, ask the students in your group if anyone would like
to try putting a condom on the plastic model the way you have just shown. If anyone
volunteers, give them the model and one condom to use for the demonstration. Make
sure none of the students leave the room with extra condoms or models. Allow other
volunteers to try if they want.
3. About 10 minutes
before the end of class, bring everyone back together. To demonstrate the effects
of drugs and alcohol on condom use, spin one peer helper around until he or she
is very dizzy , then have him or her try to put a condom on correctly.
4. Ask everyone
to talk about the day's activities and how they felt about class today. Give them
a chance to say if they felt uncomfortable, and why. Recognize that different
cultures have very different ideas about what is too personal to talk about with
the opposite sex. Welcome students to talk about what is expected in their home,
their culture, or their religion, and how this type of class might be unusual
for them. Encourage the class to be open to accepting differences. Finally, give
them a chance to say whether they feel differently about using condoms than they
did before.
5. Ask students
if they know any places where people can get condoms. Give them information about
condoms in their area: local drugstores, the health clinic, etc.
**********************
End of copied text **********************
Krishna Katha Ki Jay !
6)
PADAFILES!
(Quoted from Pada-Newsletter April 9, 2005)
Damodar Das damodar@swbell.net
wrote:
It's interesting to note how you have chosen the name "padafiles"
to describe your material. This is very close in pronunciation to the term pedophiles.
It's seems that you have unconsciously lumped yourself in with them. It appears
that just as you attack the pedophiles for being bogus you also subconscioiusly
consider yourself to be bogus. If you are indeed bogus it is better to keep yourself
in the closet. Stay off of the internet. It's already polluted enough.
[PADA: Well yes,
we are being "tongue in cheek," and we meant that consciously. And we
also we say "pada-ophiles" as well
for the same reason. So anyway, back to your point, you are saying that worship
of homosexual pedophiles is fine, and no one
should protest. So you wanted the children to get molested and you did not want
us to protest all along. You thus caused the molesting by your acquiescing and
saying the protestors are the bad guys, you (direct or de facto) protected the
molesters thereby. That means you are a worshipper of anus sex with children,
and/or a defender of such. thanks, pada-ophiles.
Damodar Das
damodar@swbell.net wrote:
you are to glorifying Krishna. I never said that worship of homesexual pedophiles
is fine. Your claim that I am saying this is simply your concoction.
[PADA: We are criticizing
the homosexual pedophile guru lineage and its supporters. This is your idea of
"Krishna's devotees"? Also, we have never seen you name publicly associated
with criticism of the GBC/ Sridhara/ Narayana maharaja's post 1977 homosexual
pedophile guru lineage, and therefore mass molesting went on while
you were asleep at the switch. These (molested) ex-kids always ask us, where were
fools like -- yourself? We know, you were harassing us, de facto, defending the
molesting. And, when you say that criticism of homosexual pedophile guru lineages
is "criticism of Krishna's devotees," you are saying that Krishna's
devotees worship homosexual pedophile guru lineages. That is what we thought you
were saying? thanks pd]
2) PROOF OF PEDOPHILE GURU LINEAGE FROM ISKCON LAWYER
(de facto: they refused to sign this paper) 10-19-98
Dear Mr. Lieberman,
please accept my humble regards. Pursuant to our conversation with you today,
please find enclosed the three points which I briefly discussed with you. Kindly
submit this document to the ISKCON officers for their review and approval, and
then sign it and return it to my attention. Please have someone contact me by
phone within 24 hours after receipt of this facsimile regarding how we are progressing
on this issue. If we do not hear from you by that time we may be forced to conclude
that you will not be signing these points.
Thanks, Timothy
Lee
POB 34421
Los Angeles CA 90034
310-287-1070
angel108b@yahoo.com
On behalf of Los Angeles ISKCON temple management, 3764 Watseka Ave. Los Angeles
Ca 90034. After considerable thought and deliberation,
We
the undersigned agree and publicly state:
1. Individual persons
who have manifest homosexual and/or pedophile tendencies and activities are not,
were not, and could not have been "chosen or appointed as God's living successors,
parampara gurus, Jesus-like saints, guru successors, worshipped acharyas"
by Srila Prabhupada or any bona fide representative of the Brahma Madhva Gaudiya
disciplic succession as taught by Srila Prabhupada.
2. The persons
who have repeatedly and vociferously founded, advocated, institutionalized, and
enforced the above mentioned deviations, are not, were not, and could not have
been, "God's living successors, worshipped acharyas, pure devotees, bona
fide spiritual masters, parampara links, Jesus-like saints" (and so on) as
described by Srila Prabhupada in his original books.
3. Direct or indirect
references have been made in numerous "Governing Body Commission" publications
that their "gurus" (including those with unresolved homosexual and pedophile
tendencies and their founders and supporters) are to be worshipped as "Jesus-like
saints," eternal gurus, pure devotees of God and so on.. For example, in
their January 1986 "Back To Godhead" (an official GBC publication) magazine
editorial, one of their homosexual pedophile "gurus" was described as
being like Jesus and Prahlad Maharaja (i.e. a Jesus-like pure devotee). And in
March 1986, in Mayapura India, another one of their homosexual pedophile gurus
was reinstated or allowed to continue in his capacity of being worshipped as a
"Jesus-like" saint "Vishnupada" (and so on).
Therefore: Persons who were voted in, certified, empowered or made as gurus, in
March of 1986, simultaneously with the re-certification of a known homosexual,
are not, were not, and cannot be bona fide gurus according to the teachings of
Srila Prabhupada.
Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, any devotee who agrees with the
above mentioned points will be welcomed at the ISKCON Los Angeles temple and he/she
will not be harassed in any way for upholding, encouraging and speaking about
the above mentioned principles.
Sincerely yours,
David Lieberman,
Esq.
Attorney for the BBTI
Who Is His Devine Grace Hridayananda Acharya Pada?
(Quoted from http://www.harekrsna.org/gbc/black/hridaya.htm)
Hridayananda
(Howard Resnick), is a self-appointed bogus GBC ISKCON
"guru" clone (clown), he perverts Srila Prabhupadas books, preaches bogus philosophy,
stealing Prabhupadas disciples.
Hridayananda received his rubber stamp guru certificate in Iskcons homosexual
re-coronation ceremony and crowned himself Acaryadeva. He personally picked that
name for himself in the days of the Zonal-Acarya nonsense with the misconception
that the was one of the "acarya
successors" of Srila Prabhupada. He forced his godbrothers to worship
him in a simultanious guru-puja, declaring Prabhupada for dead.
Hridayananda
is a nonsense guru, false acarya and bogus Sannyasi, attracted to luxurious lifestyle
and the tatas of women. He
lives like a playboy in Beverly Hills in expansive houses with swimming-pools,
cars and servants. He is a cheater, liar and thief, he
has destroyed many disciples' lives.
HRIDAYANANDA
AND HIS PADA TITLES ?
Dear IRG,
If (according to Iskcon Law) all "pada"
names have been discontinued, does the same
apply to the name Acaryadeva? Hrdayananda Goswami personally picked that name
for himself in the days of the Acarya nonsense with the misconception that the
was one of the acarya successors of Srila Prabhupada. There are countless instances
to prove that he was overwhelmed by such misconception but lets analyze two:
1) In 1979 during a visit to Mexico he became mad because a Mexican devotee named
Jaibali dasa, who had first initiation from Srila Prabhupada, wanted to get second
initiation from Satsvarupa Goswami. Hrdayananda Goswami stated that he wouldn't
tolerate this and asked the then Swami Radha Krsna to tell Jaibali that Hrdayananda
was the acarya for Latin America and the Spanish speaking world and that therefore
Jaibali had to take second initiation from him or else he would have to leave
his acarya zone because he wouldn't allow anyone to put in danger the faith of
his other disciples.
Radha Krsna approached Jaibali who immediately told him that he was giving up
the idea of taking second from Satsvarupa Goswami to avoid conflicts. This devotee
at the end left ISKCON and took shelter in the Gaudiya Math as a saner option
for him and currently lives in Tijuana assisting in their mission.
2) In July of 1978 Hrdayananda Goswami arrived in Los Angeles to attend the Rathayatra
Festival. He summoned Radha Krsna to instruct him that from then on all of Srila
Prabhupada's books published by the Spanish BBT had to include his picture because
he was the new acarya for the Spanish speaking world.
Radha Krsna talked with Ramesvara and Satsvarupa Goswami about this and both concluded
that this was a bogus idea that shouldn't be allowed. Radha Krsna informed of
this to Hrdayananda who turned mad but didn't prevail and so Srila Prabhupada's
books were saved from being desecreated. He still forced the Spanish BBT to pay
huge sums for producing his Vyasa puja books and became inimical to the LA Spanish
BBT operation forever.
Radha Krsna doesn't talk about these incidents much but if asked he can confirm
them.
So if Hrdayananda Goswami was overwhelmed by such misconception that he was a
fabulous Acarya and gave himself that name, should the name "Acaryadeva"
still be used in connection to him? Asked already about this he says that the
term "Acaryadeva" and the term "Gurudeva" mean the same and
quotes a statement of Srila Prabhupada to that effect. For him, then, his disciples
are simply saying "gurueva." But, is it the same if we consider all
the deviations and misconceptions that have ocurred in ISKCON during the last
21 years? Srila Prabhupada always wanted that his position as Founder-Acarya of
ISKCON be undertood by all. The use of the name "acarya" or "acaryadeva"
causes confusion as to where does ISKCON stand in terms of authority. Will Hrdayananda
be ready to voluntarily give up that name for the sake of honesty and unity in
the ISKCON institution?
Yours in service Bhakta Pipo
Orizaba, Mexico
From
Brahmatirtha das to PADA
You can kindly
remove me from your mailing list. I find the postings irrational, illogical, unphilosophical
and quite opposed to the way Srila Prabhupada would solve a problem.
[PADA: Yes, that
is because Brahmatirtha's GBC crew "solves problems" by villification
of innocent devotees, if not banning, beating, and as we have seen, even assassinating
devotees (and as we see above, even TODAY, threatening to kill vaishnavas).
As we all know,
and has been recorded in the Newspapers even, folks who oppose the (Brahmatirtha?)
GBC "illicit sex with men, women and children"
guru lineage can be kicked out of temples, harassed, beaten up, even assassinated.
Indeed, on the one hand Jayapataka's folks punch people, and stick guns in their
faces, even in Mayapura, the holy dham. For what crime? Not accepting Brahmatirtha's
homosexual pedophile guru lineage. On the
other hand, child beater gurus, child touching gurus, porno swamis, pedophile
guru reinstators et al. are always welcome in their temples and/or holy dham?
So, Brahmatirtha
finds the idea of philosophical exchange to be very odious. He seems to prefer
the GBC's "enforced cult ritualistic worship of homosexual pedophiles,"
using threats, harassment, violence, and even things like death threats, as the
preferred style of management. Brahmatirtha's friends are folks like:
1) "Jayadvaita
swami." He admits in his guru lineage the various so-called: acharyas, living
members of the disciplic succession, diksha gurus, Krishna's parampara successors,
padas (like Vishnupadas etc.), and in sum the "shaksat hari tvena: nikunja
yuno gurus" may engage in illicit sex with men, women and maybe (no really)
children. In other words, these rascals claim that Krishna's living direct (shaksad)
representatives may behave with less moral standing than a lusty street dog.
We also know these
"living (alleged) shaksad Vishnupadas et al." may potentially engage
in illicit sex with other's wives, which Srila Prabhupada says is like having
sex with your own mother. So, Brahmatirtha's guru lineage engages in: illicit
sex with a family's mother, father, the male and female children, and even: the
"guru's" own mother, by Srila Prabhupada's calculation. And all of this,
less than dog morality, is juxtaposed with pada titles, the disciplic succession,
guru etc.? And militantly enforced with death threats?
Even "Satan's
Bible" does not say that folks who are "shaksad hari" prabhus engage
as above, since they have at least some resepct. Indeed, as we have said before
many times, even dogs do not engage in the foul illicit activities as above, yet
Brahmatirtha's guru lineage is behaving less than even hogs and dogs? So, to juxtapose
"shaksad hari" and "less than dog" is to say that God is not
even as advanced as a dog? And they enforce that "realization" with
jackboots?
This is Brahmatirtha's
lineage? They insult God and His pure devotees by juxtaposing them with the most
vile activities known to man: including child molestion, death threats to vaishnavas
etc., and even, the actual murder of devotees who object. Of course, these vicious
smarta Pharisee jackbooters are not new. All that is new is that they have added
illicit sex worse than dogs to the "pure chain of gurus from God," whereas
previous smarta Pharisees were at least a little more cautious and they made some
attempt to hide their degraded guru lineage ideas. Previous smarta Pharisee were
not such stupid fools as to post their death threats of devotees of the Lord in
public forums either.
To the GBC's credit,
of late, their alleged "Vishnupada" has established using condoms,
on "the wife of another" (which Srila Prabhupada says is like having
sex with your mother) so they are at least trying to curb spreading AIDS in their
guru lineage when having sex with their own mothers. Of course, even the average
karmi, even the raksasas, do not have illicit sex with men, women, children and/or
their own mother, like this lineage of alleged "chain of pure devotee gurus
who are Krishna's living successors" which Brahmatirtha and similar goons
have been the vociferous bully boy jackbooters for?
2) "Hridayananda
swami." He thinks he is the acharya of all the acharyas
("acharyapada" no less), and so even Lord Chaitanya, Madhvavacarya
et al. are all his juniors and subordinates? Or what? And why does he think he
is greater than God or His acharyas? Because God's acharya morality is for fools,
better we have Hridayananda's! Thus, Hridayananda (with Brahmatirtha's help?)
has been one of the the most vociferous advocates of "the enforced cult ritualistic
worship of homosexual pedophiles as God's living shaksad hari tvena successors."
And Brahmatirtha is their vociferous cheerleader?
Hridayananda even
presided over the recoronation of the worship of a known homosexual pedophile,
as "Vishnupada" no less, while children were getting molested left,
right and center. That is why Brahmatirtha loves one of the most vicious jackbooters
of the man-boy guru lover's association so much? Hirdayananda is also another
person who has been going to college to learn mundane education, leading human
society to what Srila Prabhupada called "the slaughterhouse." He was
also ordered by Srila Prabhupada NOT to go to college.
Hridayananda has
also been "living high on the hog" while the children in his charge
were being starved, beaten and raped. And that is why Brahmatirtha loves this
de facto child negligent abuser and/or regime supporter? When we tried to ask
Hridayananda, why he reinstated the worship of the biggest known homosexual pedophile
nest builder in ISKCON, to be worshipped as his GBC's "shaksat hari Vishnupada,"
he very angrily replied, "I am not going to talk about Bhavananda."
Yes, that is because he cannot face the truth of his support for that regime.
Their GBC policy created the molestation of children, the contrived banning of
thousands of devotees who protested Hridayananda's molester pada regime, and even
the murder of dissidents. This is one of Brahmatirtha's favorite pals: the founder
father of molester-con pooja?
3) "Hari Sauri
dasa." OK, another one of the ex-biggest ex-cheerleaders for Bhavananda's
homosexual pedophile molester nest building empire. And that is why Brahmatirtha
loves these kinds of people, all of the kingpins of molester-con.]
BT: In the name
of being more Prabhupada like, your postings are quite opposed to Srila Prabhupada
methods. By the way, you definition of guru is weird. If a "guru" can
NEVER do a sin (such as child molestation or whatever) why have previous acharyas
written books on what to do when your guru falls.
[PADA: This is
interesting since it shows how the GBC is STILL trying to juxtapose child molestation
and "worshipped as shaksad hari" guru. Worse, it seems that Brahmatirtha
is trying to say that those of us who are not card carrying members of the "North
Amercican Man Boy Lover Guru's Association," are weird? Or what? No, what
is "weird" is that there are homosexual pedophiles, and their cheerleaders
like Hridayananda, in Brahmatirtha's "guru chain of God's pure successors."
Even ordinary karmis do not commit child molestation, so this is not even found
in materialists, what to speak of gurus?
You guys are the
weird ones? Brahmatirtha's GBC cronies even said that Kirtanananda is like "Jesus"
in your "Back To Godhead," when in actual fact he was covered by the
hands of 30 boys in public, and he was molesting some of them in his motorhome?
You think folks like Jesus are, were or could be: homosexual pedophiles? It seems
that you guys are really the modern smarta Pharisees of the man boy lover guru's
succession, and that makes you very weird? And even Hridayananda supported Kirtanananda
while this "covered by boys hands" spectacle was going on IN PUBLIC
for all to see. Indeed, one of the pictures on the altar, when Kirtananda was
being massaged by all those boys is: Hridayananda looking on lovingly at the molester
heaven scenario!
Srila Prabhupada
never says that our acharyas fall down? Look at the list in Bhagavad Gita? How
many have fallen into illicit sex with men, women and children? Zero! Moreover,
Srila Prabhupada says that it is the sahajiyas, the babajis, the mayavadis, and
so on, who claim that our acharyas fall down. The Nectar Of Devotion says that
a bona fide acharya will never fall down, but only a person who has become acharya
by his own BOGUS authority. Srila Prabhupada says that saints like Narada Muni
cannot be brought to the platform of material attachment, and anyone who thinks
they can fail are severe offenders. Moreover, "gurusuh narah matih, narakah
sah": anyone who thinks the gurus fall down are residents of hell.]
BTS: You have clearly
mixed up guru and great acharya, a distinction that Srila Prabhupada clearly makes
in Nectar of Devotion and other places.
[PADA: Correct.
The "Nectar Of Devotion" says it is the bogus cheater imitators who
fall down, not the bona fide gurus. As for mixing up the titles, your best friend
Hridayananda calls himself the acharya of the acharyas, acarya pada, so you are
the folks who are mixing up these titles?]
BT: Srila Prabhupada
always called him self "founder-acharya" to make that distinction. You
have now blurred that distinction - the same error made by the GBC when Srila
Prabhupada departed.
[PADA: Now you
are saying that Vishnupadas, Acharyapadas, Tirthapadas, Gurupadas, shaksad hari
prabhus, are making errors? That is not our philosophy. The guru must be free
from the platform of making mistakes. If they are making mistakes, such as promoting
pedophiles as God's successors, then they are not gurus or even normal moral human
beings.]
BT: So before you
cast stones at all and criticize those engaged in service - look in the mirror.
By the way you are very strict about following all of Srila Prabhupada instructions
according to your post. What about the often repeated injunction not to criticize
vaisnavas? Srila Prabhupada commentaries on this are repeated often and clearly.
Yet, you criticize almost any devotee in ISKCON, with a leadership roll, who has
any type of problem, especially sexual. When Srila Prabhupada was on the planet
there were devotees in leadership who had this type problem. How did Srila Prabhupada
deal with it? NEVER public ostracizement.
So in the name
of serving Srila Prabhupada you seem to have chosen a quite un-Prabhupada like
method. Thank you for removing me from you list. Your servant, Brahmatirtha das
[PADA:
Oh, so criticizing homosexual pedophile pooja-ites is blaspheming vaishnavas?
Or what? Oh you are an expert smarta Pharisee!]
|
