Next,
Srila Prabhupada writes to Gargamuni congradulating him in dealing well with Kirtanananda's
trying to influence Brahmananda, saving him from the calamity of impersonalism.
"I congratulate you for your successful dealing with your good brother, Sriman
Brahmananda, against His falling back a prey to Kirtanananda's recent propaganda.
To save a man from impersonal calamity is the greatest service to humanity. I
also thank Rupanuga & Rayarama for helping you in your very laudable action.
Brahmananda is very pure at heart."
"He might have been misled by Kirtanananda for the time being but Krishna
did not allow him to fall back. According to Caitanya Mahaprabhu, the Lord is
full in six opulences & the rascal impersonalists says that the Lord has no
form & the most dangerous accusation for the Lord that He assumes a material
form when he descends. The Impersonalist is of the opinion that the absolute has
no form & He appears in a particular type of form according to the whim of
nonsense; The impersonalist presents any form nonsensical by his imagination &
worships it as God. This accusation of the Lord is the greatest offense of the
nonsense impersonalist."
"Such offender can never realise the transcendental form of the Lord &
the Lord puts such nonsense into more & more darkness so that the dangerous
impersonalist can never know the Supreme personality of Godhead. I do not believe
that Kirtanananda has gone to such an extent of ailing situation but if he does
not rectify himself immediately his future is very dark. If he is sincere
in his concept of impersonal Absolute he should enter into correspondence with
me & I shall refute all his arguments; but I understand that he could not
answer you even when you hit him with some questions. I shall request that you
save this poor creature from impersonal calamity."
Then he writes again to Brahmananda "I may disclose herewith that I never
took Kirtanananda into complete confidence but I was trying to improve his position
because he has also rendered much personal service to me. I am very much obliged
to him for the service as I am to my other disciples & I am very sorry that
Maya has taken advantage of his disobedience & he has fallen to Maya's illusion--but
he should not continue for a very long time as I will always pray to Krishna for
his recovery. For the time being he should simply chant Hare Krishna without any
attempt at lecturing. The impersonalist cannot render any service to Krishna because
he is a great offender. Under the circumstances, Krishna will not accept food
prepared by Kirtanananda in his present diseased condition. If he at all wants
to render service to Krishna he may be engaged at washing dishes &
this will improve his condition."
Now Srila Prabhupada advises Brahmananda to move on and not waste any more time
talking about Kirtanananda. On the 22nd he writes and instucts him "So
far as Kirtanananda's chapter is concerned, forget all this, Maya's play. We shall
be sorry for Kirtanananda's plight under Maya and may not waste our valuable time
talking about him. The best thing that you have done is that he should no longer
speak in our temples. We shall all pray to Krishna for his recovery & only
by His grace can he come back to his real identity."
Then to Jadurani he writes on the 26th. "Regarding Kirtanananda, there
is nothing to be said about but one should be very careful not to fall sick like
him. In the material world there is constant fight between maya & the living
entity. Maya is very strong & we can fall a victim at her hand at any moment.
The only means of protecting us from the attack of maya is to be fully Krishna
Conscious. The proportion in which we fall back in Krishna Consciousness is filled
up by the influence of maya. It is exactly like the proportion of negligence of
our health is subsequently resulted in our falling ill. The person who is very
careful about his health does not generally fall ill. Similarly a person who is
always fixed up in Krishna Consciousness cannot be defeated by maya. Sometimes
in spite of our full Krishna Consciousness we fall a victim to maya but that is
temporary just as seasonal changes such calamities do come & pass away &
we have to endure them. If Kirtanananda has ever sincerely served Krishna, &
his spiritual master, he will not fall down. The temporary systems will fall down
without delay. We should all pray to Krishna for his steady recovery. My grief
for Kirtanananda isn't anything personal but I am sorry that he has become like
a mayavadi in spite of my best efforts to help him. Hope you are well."
Then to Rayarama on the 27th " Regarding Kirtanananda's article, I do
not know what he has written but I can guess that it must be polluted with impersonal
poison, so for the time being you can keep this article aside. I was so glad to
learn that you are acting exactly like a lion cub & I know that in the future
you shall conquer ever many jackals. We have got experience in India that the
jackals roar four times at night without any influence but the one roar of a lion
drives away many elephants. The pressure Maya is elephant-like, big, but the roaring
of Nrsimhadeva can drive away many elephants."
Maybe at this point, the readers of this editorial have pretty much understood
the mood of our beloved Srila Prabhupada concerning Kirtanananda and do not need
to hear any more. I do not want to become redundant in my reporting here. But
just the same, for histories sake, and for those who want to hear the rest of
the letters about Kirtanananda, I shall go on.
Srila Prabhupada was so magnanamous. Though we treat him badly due to our immaturity,
he has undying compassion for us. He knew that Kirtanananda was really ok because
Srila Prabhupada was his well wisher determined to save him from maya's clutches.
To Rayarama he writes on Nov 2nd "Regarding Kirtanananda, I cannot allow
him to become Keith again. He is my spiritual son and I shall never allow him
to fall down. When I return I shall drag him forcibly and make all right again.
Anyone who has once come to me has become my beloved son; temporarily one may
display some Mayic affliction, but that can not prolong. I thank Lord Krishna
for Satyavrata (Moskowitz) and Woompati and I hope sincerely that Kirtanananda
will also come back again with renewed energy."
That same day, Srila Prabhupada writes to Haimavati "Don't be mortified
with Kirtanananda's behavior. The present feature of Kirtanananda and Hayagriva
are temporary manifestation of maya. They will be corrected as soon as I return.
You have rightly said that he and Hayagriva came like two children and took their
things from the temple. Don't you think that all this is childish activities?
If Kirtanananda donated the candle holders and clothes to the Temple of Krishna
how could he take them back for his own purpose. If they think impersonally that
Krishna is present everywhere, how could they think of Krishna not being present
in the New York Temple. So all their activities are befitting children; so as
children commit mistakes and again reforms similarly they will be reformed in
due course. After their malady of impersonalism is over. You can go on with you
regular classes, chanting Hare Krishna sincerely, without taking seriously into
account the childish activities of Kirtanananda and his friend."
Srila Prabhupada makes these statements about Kirtanananda's taking sannyas in
a letter to Madhusudana the same day he wrote to Rayarama and Haimavati the letters
above. "Kirtanananda was awarded the position of a Sannyasi because he
wanted it although I could understand it that he wanted to be a spiritual master
himself. Lord Caitanya wanted every one should be a spiritual master provided
he follows the order of Lord Caitanya. The Lord's mission was to defeat the Mayavada
philosophy and establish in the philosophy of Krishna consciousness because Krishna
is the Supreme Lord the Personality of Godhead. Anyone following the order of
Lord Caitanya under the guidance of His bonafide representative, can become a
spiritual master and I wish that in my absence all my disciples become the bonafide
spiritual master to spread Krishna Consciousness throughout the whole world. I
want it but Kirtanananda was too much puffed up and artificially he took up a
certificate from me that he has been awarded the order to a Sannyasi, In the spiritual
field nobody can become a bonafide spirtual master by dissatisfying his spiritual
master. It is said that one can satisfy the Supreme Lord simpy by satisfying the
spiritual master and one who dissatisfies the spiritual master has no place in
the spiritual world. Kirtanananda wanted to become a spiritual master by dissatisfying
his spiritual master and as such he has fallen down. He cannot say anything genuine
any more till he has had revival of his pure consciousness in the spiritual world
as mentioned above."
Kirtanananda had become very unpopular around Iskcon centers because of the
dissatisfaction of Srila Prabhupada. Devotees were blocking him from entering
various centers and in one incident one devotee even spit on Kirtanananda, which
upset Srila Prabhupada. He writes on Nov 5th. "I've received one letter
from Hayagriva expressing his sorrow about Kirtanananda's plight in relation with
his God-brothers. He has complained that some of the boys had -spat upon Kirtanananda's
body and it is a fact it is the most regrettable incident. The fact is that once
combined in Krishna Consciousness, one cannot be separated at any time but the
incident of separation from the society of Kirtanananda and Hayagriva is accidental."
"I had advised that Kirtanananda should be asked to not speak but I never
asked that he should not enter the Temple. We invite outsiders to come and hear
our kirtanas but I think Kirtanananda might have been disturbing the peace of
the Temple and therefore you all asked him not to enter the Temple. I do not know
what had actually transpired but the incident is not very happy. If possible the
boy who had spat upon Kirtanananda in the presence of Hayagriva must be requested
to send a letter of regret and apology for the mistake he had done. I have already
given you a list of good behavior for the devotees. The person who is a devotee
must develop those good qualities. Kirtanananda's attempt to defy me might have
provoked all these undesirable incidences, but in the future we shall be very
much careful to deal in such provocative situations; I can understand the provocation
in this situation was set in motion by Kirtanananda's uncalled for behavior."
That last letter was to Rayarama, and Srila Prabhupada brings it up again in a
letter writen the same day to Brahmananda. " The boy who spat upon the
person of Kirtanananda must send a letter of regret and apology. That will be
nice. You should always try to pacify the living entities in their rebellious
propensities. These individual propensities are factual evidence for their becoming
individual entities. If everything would have been impersonal there would have
been no scope for the individual manifestations. It is understood that Hayagriva
will purchase the property at Wilkes-Barr with the help of Dr. Henderson's financial
assistance. I do not mind that they will do something separately, but I wish that
there may not be any misbehavior between the God-brothers. I think you can write
Hayagriva a personal letter regretting the incident which had unfortunately occurred,
namely spitting over the person of Kirtanananda."
In another twist of events in our drama, Hyragriva was not going to return Srila
Prabhupada's manuscript of his Bhagavad-gita. There was much separation between
the godbrothers over the whole incident with Kirtanananda, and it was very upsetting
to Srila Prabhupada. More and more the two disciples were becoming seperate from
the rest of Iskcon, and Prabhupada felt that his smoothly running organization
was greatly disrupted by even one or two disciples working independently their
guru's blessings. Hayagriva was trying to get back at the other devotees be refusing
to return the manuscript of Srila Prabhupad's Gita he was working on.
All this Srila Prabhupada reveals to Rayarama on Nov 9th. "It certainly
is very good news that MacMillan Co. may now agree to publish Gita Upanisad in
a soft cover edition and is considering the hard cover very seriously. In one
other letter Brahmananda writes that there is not yet contract signed. So I do
not know what exactly is the position. But under any circumstances, the MSS [manuscript]
must be made ready. I do not follow you when you write to say that Hayagriva won't
deliver the MSS. If he does not return it then how are you going to publish it
and how are you going to edit it. In two previous letters you write that he has
already returned it."
"In letter of Oct. 21, you write 'Hayagriva has left the manuscript of Gita
with me and I am going to have it typed and sent to you, a few chapters at a time.'
In letter of Oct. 25 you write 'I've been working on the manuscript which Hayagriva
returned to me'. In this letter you wrote to say that he is trying to obviously
punish us by not returning same. The quarrel amongst yourselves, the Godbrothers
is not very much palatable. I am now thinking about our society. We were very
smoothly going on but this disruption created by Kirtanananda has plagued and
disturbed the situation. The best thing is to do our duty nicely with faith in
Krishna and everything will be adjusted. You are nicely doing BTG."
"The separation of Kirtanananda and Hayagriva is not a very happy incident.
I was practically in tears for their attitude of separation on such flimsy grounds.
In other words it is my incapability that I could not save these two souls, but
this a great evidence that every soul is individual. The nonsense theory of oneness
becomes null and void by the evidence presented in this incident. But we should
not be angry with these poor souls. Try to convince them by argument and reason
but do not become angry with them."
"Lord Nityananda when he was dealing with Jagai and Madhai maintained the
maximum amount of tolerance and patience in spite of the greatest provocation.
The two brothers, Jagai and Madhai, committee. violence on Lord Nityananda. Even
Lord Caitanya, the author of Siksastak, became agitated. But Lord Nityananda Prabhu
in the matter remained calm and quiet and delivered the two rascals to the highest
elevation. We should always try to represent Lord Nityananda Prabhu in the matter
of preaching work."
"Kirtanananda is a crazy man. That is proved. He says that he has become
equal to the spiritual master but he is such a fool that he does not understand
the principle of disciple even in ordinary worldly affairs. Even if one becomes
equal to the spiritual master in education and knowledge, still one has to maintain
the disciplinary principle of obeying one chief man in any establishment. If such
discipline is not maintained, no establishment can make any progress. Hope you
are well." Calcutta
11th November, 1967
My dear Brahmananda,
"The quotation as you have given from my letter of Oct. 11, just stands.
I do not want crowd of Kirtananandas but I want a single soul like Brahmananda,
Mukunda, Rayarama, and Satsvarupa. The same example is always applicable that
one moon is sufficient for the night as not thousands of stars........I have read
your statements regarding opening centers. I am not in agreement with Mr. Altman
that we are expanding very thinly."
"In my opinion, a single sincere soul can maintain a center. You know I started
the center at 26 2nd Ave. alone. I took the risk of 200.00 dollars per month for
the rent. At that time there were no assistants. Mukunda was at that time a friend
but there was no responsibility for him for maintaining the center. Gradually
Kirtanananda and Hayagriva joined but they did not take any responsibility. Still
I was maintaining the establishment simply depending on Krishna and then Krishna
sent me everything--men and money. Similarly, if a sincere soul goes out and opens
a center in any part of the world Krishna will help him in all respects. Without
being empowered by Krishna, nobody can preach Krishna Consciousness. It is not
academic qualification or financial strength which helps in these matters, but
it is sincerity of purpose which helps us always.......That is preaching, cooking,
writing, talking, chanting everything one man's show. I never thought about the
audience."
"I was prepared to chant if there were no man to hear me. The principle of
chanting is to glorify the Lord and not to attract a crowd. If Krishna hears nicely
then he will ask some sincere devotee to gather in such place. Therefore, be advised
that thousands of centers may be started if we find out a sincere soul for each
and every center. We do not require more men to start. If there is one sincere
soul that is sufficent to start a new center."
"With this expectation I wanted to send Kirtanananda to London but he has
proved himself unworthy. When I arrive in your state, I may ask Rayarama to go
to London and your good self to Russia and Gargamuni to Holland. The incident
created by Kirtanananda and Hayagriva may not disappoint us in the least. Let
us remain sincere to Krishna and His bonafide representative and we are sure to
carry out our mission successfully. Hope you are well."
15th November, 1967
"My dear Rayarama,
The incident of Kirtanananda and Hayagriva chapter may now be closed. We shall
always pray to Krishna for their recovery and we should not seriously take their
counter propaganda. I am sure they will flap for some time without any effect
on our Krishna Consciousness, service. Let us go ahead with our work and everything
will be all right. Most important thing at present is to deal with MacMillan Co.
Regarding editing of my books it was rightly entrusted to you from the very beginning
but Kirtanananda wanted that the editing should be done by Hayagriva. But I understand
from your version that in some places of Gita Upanisad he has followed Swami Nikilananda
who is quite unaware of Krishna Consciousness. By their present behavior it appears
that Hayagriva belongs to the same feather and Krishna has saved His Gita Upanisad
by transferring the whole thing into your hands."
Almost a week goes by before Srila Prabhupada mentions the incident with Kirtanananda
and Hyragriva. Then to Woomapati he writes about the relationship between the
disciple and the spiritual master. "I am so glad to learn that you are
now getting the fruit of chanting Hare Krishna. Hare Krishna is so nice that it
clears the dirty things from the mind of the devotee and the more one is used
to chant the Holy Name offenselessly, the more one develops love of God, forgetting
the whole material nonsense. (It is my duty to deliver you the right thing in
right earnestness and it is the duty of the receiver to act in the standard spiritual
regulation. When you left us I simply prayed to Krishna for your return to Krishna
Consciousness because that was my duty. Any good soul who approaches me once for
spiritual enlightenment is supposed to be depending on my responsiblity to get
him back to Krishna, back to home."
"The disciple may misunderstand a bonafide spiritual master being obliged
to do so under pressure of Maya's influence. But a bonafide spiritual master never
lets go a devotee once accepted. When a disciple misunderstands a bonafide spiritual
master, the master regrets for his inability to protect the disciple and sometimes
he cries with tears in the eyes. We had an experience while my Guru Maharaja was
alive. One of His disciples who accepted sannyasa was one day forcibly dragged
by his wife. My Guru Maharaja lamented with tears in His eyes saying that He could
not save the soul.)"
"We should always, therefore, be careful in the matter of being attacked
by Maya's influence and the only means of guarantee is to chant Hare Krishna offenselessly.
The greatest offense is to defy the spiritual master and to act sinfully, thinking
in the strength of chanting. If a man thinks that chanting will save him from
all kinds of sinful reaction deliberately committed by him, then he becomes the
greatest offender."
"By chanting Hare Krishna certainly we become free from all sinful reactions,
but that does not mean that we shall deliberately commit sins and counteract it
by chanting. Your reference to Kirtanananda and Hayagriva is very nicely appreciated.
We shall silently pray for them to Krishna and shed tears for them for our inability
to save them. Let us honestly pray and go ahead with Krishna Consciousness. More
when we meet."
As we continue reading all of Srila Prabhupada's letters written til the end
of 1967, one finds little mention of Kirtanananda or Hyragriva. Once on the 21th
of December there is this small referrence . "I am sorry for Hayagriva
and Kirtanananda who have left me when I need them very much. Krsna may give them
good sense and let them come back to work with me." Then to Brahmananda
on the 29th. Srila Prabhupada writes "Regarding Hayagriva and Kirtanananda,
if they come again we should accommodate them and should not continue the misunderstanding
that has been engineered. I think Hayagriva is anxious in having his name printed
in the publication of Gitopanisad. I do not have any objections that his name
may be mentioned as one of the editors helping in the editing of Gitopanisad,
just to encourage him and keep him in our camp, in case that he may come back
and accept our philosophy and resume his editing talent. He has committee. a blunder,
but just so that he may be encouraged to come back you may mention his name also
along with Rayarama's. He is not so convinced of his impersonalist philosophy.
It is only due to Kirtanananda's influence that he[Hayagriva] has left us."
After so much disappointment from Kirtanananda Srila Prabhupada had felt saddened
and he had wondered how the movement would go on with his leading disciples acting
against him. But in his letter to Rayarama on New Years Eve, we see Srila Prabhupada
encouraged again, feeling that now his work will again go on! "My Dear
Rayarama, Please accept my blessings. My joy has no bounds when I received your
calendar so nicely imagined. Now I think Krishna has selected the right person
for our propaganda department--Sriman Rayarama Brahmacari! A sincere worker is
always recognized by Krishna. I do not know how shall I thank you, but I am confident
of my future hopes in the sincere students like you, Brahmananda and others; &
now if I die I will die blissful, the work will go on." Jaya Srila Prabhupada!!
This brings 1967 to a close, with the exception of one letter I failed to mention
that was sent to Madhusudana in December where Srila Prabhupada makes the following
mention to his renegade sannyasa. ".... duty is understood through the
transparent medium via media of the Spiritual Master. It is better service to
Krishna and Spiritual Master in a feeling of separation; sometimes there is risk
in the matter of direct service. For example, Kirtanananda was giving me direct
service by massaging, cooking for me, and so many other things; but later on by
dictation of Maya, he became puffed up, so much so that he thought his Spiritual
Master a common man, and was existing only on account of his service. This mentality
at once pushed him down. Of course, those who are sincere devotee, they take direct
service as an opportunity, but the illusory energy is so strong that it acts on
this doctrine of familiarity breeds contempt. Kirtanananda was thinking I was
existing on his service, instead of realizing I was giving him opportunity to
do me some service."
In sharp contrast to the situation with Kirtanananda, Srila Prabhupada displayed
much satisfaction with his sincere disciples who were submissive to him. This
is displayed nicely in his encouraging letter to Rayarama on January 11, 1968."Please
take it for granted that I have sanctioned all your schemes. Because you are sincere
worker Krishna is dictating from within you as He has promised in the Bhagavad-gita,
and things are coming so nicely.
May Krishna grace you more and more and in your advanced service of Krishna Consciousness.
You have very nicely stated that I am your life. This means you are my body and
so neither life nor body can be separated because on the spiritual platform there
is no such distinction. On material platform sometimes life is separated from
body, but in the Absolute platform there is no such distinction. Dr. R__________
foolishly makes such distinction on the Body of Krishna, and therefore when Krishna
says that one should become His devotee, he commends that it is not to the Person
Krishna, but to the Light within Krishna. He does not know that in the spiritual
platform, there is no such distinction of life and body."