Letter Sep. 07,
2003 GBC meeting
9/7
LOS ANGELES GBC MEETING (or PADA's comedy moment?)
TESTIMONY ON THE POISON CASE
SANAT and MUKUNDA updateDear prabhus, I first suspected that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned when I saw raw film footage of the "final pastimes" in Vrindaban in the spring of 1978. I mentioned my suspicions to Yuga Dharma das, and he confided... "Yes, I was walking upstairs behind Tamal and Bhavananda before Srila Prabhupada left His body, and I overheard them discusssing how they were poisoning Srila Prabhupada"...I asked why he did not report anything, and he told me that he feared that they would kill him as well.
It is chilling to realize that Srila Prabhupada' Iskcon movement has been conducted for the last 26 years under the satanic and ruthless control of those who gleefully tortured Him to death! It is high time that we elect the GBC, bring the poison issue out into the open, and restore His movement to Him, as Acharya ....IN THE CENTER WHERE HE IS MEANT TO BE! Your eternal servant, Nara Narayan Vishwakarma das
Letter Sep. 14,
2003 Rocana's
Posthumous Church
AN EX GURUKULI'S SUICIDE THOUGHTS
OUCH!
Rocana's Posthumous Church / "The Church Of Ritvik" By Rocana dasa/
MAKHARADVAJA
Dear pada Yet then Rochana suddenly switches hats and becomes a disciple of (the GBC's guru) Ravindra Swarupa's saying: Srila Prabhupada is dead, gone, "posthumous," "post mortem," and in sum: Srila Prabhupada is now the "post samadhi" diksha guru. Now Rocana asks, "Why worship a dead body like that of the Sampradaya Acharya's? Rocana says we need to worship a living person, not a dead and gone person like Srila Prabhupada. He only differs from the GBC in that his "living guru" has no name, address or apparent real existence? Either that, or the "living guru" of Rocana's is really: Rochana himself, since Srila Prabhupada says that by minimising the acharyas one is making himself the guru?
To sum, it is an insult to constantly imply, as Rocana's team does every day, that Srila Prabhupada is now the post mortem, i.e. dead, gone and de facto irrelevant guru? Worse, Rocana says that Srila Prabhupada's idea of worship of the bona fide acharyas makes him a sort of detestable "ritvik pundit." Rocana also says Srila Prabhupada is a deviant from the Vedas, since Srila Prabhupada says we must worship the bona fide acharyas whereas Rocana says: "this is not found in the tradition." Rocana also complains that Srila Prabhupada's idea to make a Governing Body (and have some of them acting as priests) is exactly what the Christian Church does, so Rocana complains that Prabhupada is a mundane relgioninst. Rocana is directly attacking Srila Prabhupada as the real deviant.